have come under pressure following SEBI's discussions about potential new curbs on equity derivatives, leading to significant drops in both stocks. However, a closer look at their business models reveals that their sensitivity to regulatory changes is quite different.
→ Contrasting Revenue Models:
BSE's revenue is directly tied to the premium value of options, charging a percentage-based transaction fee. Therefore, its performance is best tracked by the Average Daily Premium Turnover (ADPT).
Angel One's revenue comes from a flat brokerage fee of ₹20 per order, regardless of the trade's premium value. Its revenue is thus more dependent on the total number of orders.
→ Divergent Financial Impact from Previous Curbs:
Despite earlier SEBI measures—like increased contract sizes and stricter margin requirements—BSE's ADPT actually grew by 35% sequentially in Q4 FY25 and another 28% in Q1 FY26. This shows the company's revenue has been resilient to past regulatory changes.
In contrast, Angel One's total orders in the F&O segment fell by 25% sequentially in Q4 FY25. Even with a slight recovery in Q1 FY26, the volume remains 22% lower than before the previous curbs were fully implemented.
→ Financial Outlook and Market Position:
Analysts expect BSE's earnings per share (EPS) to grow by 54% in FY26, while Angel One's EPS may fall by 24%.
Given its business model, BSE seems better positioned to handle any future regulatory curbs. The exchange also benefits from a duopoly market structure and has shown its ability to grow revenue despite regulatory headwinds, unlike Angel One.